Pages

Selasa, 29 Mei 2018

Guideline for Model of Webquest Activity Process



Worksheet
Welcome
Welcome         : Introduction to Argumentative Writing – Cigarette should be completely prohibited no matter of its implications
Description      : An argumentative writing or essay is genre of writing that requires the student to investigate a topic, collect, generate, and evaluate evidence and estabilish a position on the topic in concise manner.
Grade              : 9-12
Curriculum      : English / Language Arts
Keywords       : Argumentative essay, Argumentative Writing, Prohibited of Cigarette.
Author             : Moh. Rudi Taufana

Introduction
In this part, I am taking the journey to explore the basic structure, techniques and step to write a good argumentative essay and try to persuade and present well-reasoned arguments on debatable issue is Cigarette should be completely prohibited no matter of its implications.

Tasks
I do collecting ideas and information of :
1.      The structure of an argumentative essay
2.      The steps in writing a good argumentative essay and
3.      The techniques or approaches in writing a good argumentative essay.

Resources
2.      http://education.seattlepi.com/write-good-argumentative-essay-introduction-1484.html


Process
 Starting write an Argumentative Writing
Resources
4.      https://essaybasics.com/should-cigarette-smoking-be-banned-argumentative-essay-sample/

Evaluation
The Evaluation of my Argumentative essay is based on rubric of argumentative essay. For more information you may visit on internet link, https://www.mesacc.edu/~paoih30491/RubricArgumentEssay.html






Argument Essay Rubric
(maximum of 15 points for each essay)

Requirements
Points
Earned

4
3
2
1

INTRODUCTION
Background/History
Define the Problem
Thesis Statement
Well developed introductory paragraph contains detailed background information, a clear explanation or definition of the problem, and a thesis statement.
Introductory paragraph contains some background information and states the problem, but does not explain using details. States the thesis of the paper.
Introduction states the thesis but does not adequately explain the background of the problem.  The problem is stated, but lacks detail.
Thesis and/or problem is vague or unclear.
Background details are a seemingly random collection of information, unclear, or not related to the topic.
 
____
CONCLUSION
Conclusion summarizes the main topics without repeating previous sentences; writer's opinions and suggestions for change are logical and well thought out.
Conclusion summarizes main topics.  Some suggestions for change are evident.
Conclusion summarizes main topics, but is repetitive. No suggestions for change and/or opinions are included.
Conclusion does not adequately summarize the main points. No suggestions for change or opinions are included.
____
MAIN POINTS
Body Paragraphs
Refutation
Three or more main points are well developed with supporting details. Refutation paragraph acknowledges the opposing view, and summarizes their main points.
Three or more main points are present but may lack detail and development in one or two. Refutation paragraph acknowledges the opposing view, but doesn't summarize points.
Three or more main points, but all lack development. Refutation paragraph missing and/or vague.
Less than three main points, with poor development of ideas.  Refutation missing or vague.
____
USE OF SOURCES
Documentation
All source material is used and smoothly integrated into the text. All sources are accurately documented and in the desired format on the Works Cited page.
All sources are relevant and reliable.
All source material is used. All sources are accurately documented, but a few are not in the desired format on the Works Cited page.
Most sources are relevant and reliable.
All sources are accurately documented, but many are not in the desired format on the Works Cited page. Some sources are relevant and reliable. Lacks sources and/or sources are not accurately documented. Incorrect format is used.
Sources are not relevant nor reliable.
____
SENTENCE PRECISION
Sentence Clarity

The writer treats the subject seriously using formal language. All sentences are complete, accurate, and clear; the writer controls the point of view appropriately.
The writer uses some informal language and slang. Most sentences are complete, accurate and clear; there is an occasional use of "you" in the essay, indicating a lack of revision or control.
Some unclear or confused sentences; the writer shifts person throughout the essay or uses "you" and "I" frequently.
Many unclear or incomplete sentences.
____
MECHANICS
Punctuation & Capitalization
Punctuation and capitalization are correct.
Sentence structure is generally correct. Some awkward sentences do appear. There are one or two errors in punctuation and/or capitalization.
Work contains structural weaknesses and grammatical errors. There are three or four errors in punctuation and/or capitalization.
Work contains multiple incorrect sentence structures. There are four or more errors in punctuation and/or capitalization.
____

Introduction/Conclusion _______
                   Main Points _______
                Organization  _______
                             Style _______
                    Mechanics _______

Total Points ______ = grade of ______
Grade Equivalent (15 points maximum):
A =  13 - 15 points
B =  10 - 12 points
C =  7 - 9 points
D =  4 - 6 points
F =  0 - 3




Conclusion
 The process of making argumentative through the use of this webquest is easy to understand and also using simple explanation, so far it is really helpful for the beginner author.







0 komentar:

Posting Komentar